Watchtower would never display this info in a chart. Rather they spin "peak publishers" to make it look like amazing growth. Inactive and faders would not be counted in the "peak publisher" total. 6 months of non reporting of field service time would take you out of that column and put you into the exit column.
the girl next door
JoinedPosts by the girl next door
-
44
Decrease of numbers in Jehovah's Witnesses via Deaths, DFings, or Turning Inactive
by flipper inso i'm sure a good number of us saw the chart that i believe the poster splash put on another thread of figures since 1990 regarding how many baptized and % of increase each year .
i started analyzing it ( and i know some referred to it briefly on the other thread ) and guessing of reasons the % of increase didn't match the number of newly baptized.
and of course common sense tells us that either jw's leave the cult each year through death, fading into inactivity, or getting dfed.
-
-
-
4
do you live in the usa and would you like to help people with out it costing you anything
by pepperheart inhi if you go onto youtube and look for goodsearch.com and see what abc news has to say about it.its a search engine and so that you use it it donates half the profits of each search to charity its raised over $11 million dollars to 1000s of charitys.local,national and international .
again if you look on youtube for freerice.com you can see what nbc news has to say about it.the united nations has a charity called the world food programe they own a website called freerice.com its a quiz with many subjects english maths spanish etc and when you get an answer right the sponsors pay for 10 grains of rice, they have got up to 30 million grains in one day and since 2007 have got over 95 billion grains for the worlds starving.if you go onto youtube the wfp have a site where you can see the work they do around the world .
-
-
the girl next door
Two threads? Borderline spam. -
12
If Donald Trump becomes President, who will be on his Cabinet
by RubaDub injust some thoughts if trump becomes president.. there are 15 cabinet positions/advisors currently.
they are the secretaries of:.
agriculture.
-
-
the girl next door
Trump is not getting in, so the mental masturbation of building a cabinet for him is too trialsome. But Paul Reubens should be in there somewhere. -
49
Who would you vote for Today?
by James Mixon ind. trump or h. clinton and why.. i would vote for gun slinging trump..
-
-
the girl next door
I actually like Sanders and will probably vote for him. But I am not deluding myself. Trump has answered no questions. Satisfactorily to me anyway. He is like a reality TV show gone bad. Carson puts me to sleep. Fiorina catches my attention. Bush seems the likely shoo in despite all nay sayers. The other GOP candidates? Maybe Rubio sneaks in, but everyone else needs to drop out.
-
49
Who would you vote for Today?
by James Mixon ind. trump or h. clinton and why.. i would vote for gun slinging trump..
-
-
the girl next door
Hillary has this in the bag easily. Everyone knows that right? Biden is the only one that would have challenged her. -
12
The "overly attached witness parents" problem
by scaredtospeak init's so good to finally be nineteen years old.
graduated from high school, taken more seriously as an adult.
i even have a job.
-
-
the girl next door
I'm sure your parents function under the assumption that you "moving out" is also going to lead you to "leaving the religion" They don't think you are solid enough "in the truth" to maintain without their strings. Contemplating the empty nest is always difficult for parents. I had a great relationship with my parents. I left home at 19 and it was very hard on them. The difficulty in your relationship with your parents isn't the angst your moving out will cause them, instead the real difficulty is coming when they realize you are that "apostate". -
4
Evangelicals Lag Behind Mormons and Jehovah's Witnesses
by the girl next door in.
source article: http://www.christianitytoday.com/gleanings/2015/november/evangelicals-mormons-jehovahs-witnesses-church-involvement.html.
-
-
-
20
Verify the Audit Checklist/Destruction of Files!
by Atlantis inseveral people have asked if the audit checklist boe/destruction of files/ can be verified.
atlantis said that if the previous information was not enough evidence, then i should send you the boe letter where the watchtower admits to sending out the annual audit inspection checklist.. .. write these down:.
.please see: page 2, number 5. please see: last paragraph on page 3.. please see: page 4 annual audit of files.
-
-
the girl next door
"The fundamental intent of the WTS in it's instructions to UK elders is two fold. Firstly, it is to keep the amount and type of information held about individuals to an absolute minimum, especially where some kind of judicial matter is concerned. They do not want individuals making data access requests, getting hold of the musings and opinions of elders and then using that in a civil case against the congregation.
Secondly they want to keep any data that may be used in a situation such as the Royal Commission to an absolute administrative minimum. So, for example, a "known" child abuser would have sufficient information held to indicate to the authorities a measure of due diligence but not enough that would give an alleged abuser an opportunity to bring some case against the congregation."
-
40
WTS checklist for Elders to destroy evidence?
by DarioKehl inhttps://www.reddit.com/r/exjw/comments/3t1yp7/marc_and_cora_posted_on_utube/.
hot off the presses from exjw reddit earlier today.
massive leak in uk.. if true, this is big (and very, very disturbing)..
-
-
-
24
Massive Destruction of Judicial Files Ordered by By Servce Department?
by Room 215 inover on the silentlambs facebook site is a copy of a document that purports to be an order by the service depart to destroy files relating to child molestation cases: https://www.facebook.com/silentlambs/photos/a.571978169529812.1073741826.144752662252367/970409503020008/?type=3&theater.
have any of you seen this?
is this a real document or bogus?.
-
-
